USCIS Requirement for EB1A Judge/Review Criteria

The USCIS requirement described in the passage involves evaluating whether the person has acted as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specification. Here are the key USCIS requirements and considerations based on the passage:

1. Judging the Work of Others: USCIS evaluates whether the person has experience in assessing and evaluating the work of other individuals in the same or a related field. This can include activities like peer reviewing, serving on dissertation committees, or evaluating research submissions.

2. Examples of Judging the Work of Others: USCIS provides examples of activities that can demonstrate the person's experience in judging the work of others. These examples include:

   • Peer reviewing for a scholarly journal, supported by evidence such as requests from journals and proof of completed reviews.

   • Peer reviewing abstracts or papers submitted for scholarly conferences in the same field.

   • Serving as a member of a Ph.D. dissertation committee that makes judgments regarding the satisfaction of doctoral degree requirements.

   • Serving as a peer reviewer for government research funding programs.

3. Evidence of Actual Participation: To meet this criterion, the petitioner must demonstrate that the person not only received invitations to judge the work of others but also actively participated in such assessments. For instance, if the person has been a peer reviewer for a scholarly journal, the petitioner should provide a copy of a review request from the journal and evidence confirming that the person completed the review.

In summary, to satisfy this USCIS requirement, the person must have a track record of assessing and evaluating the work of others in the same or related field. The evidence should demonstrate that they have been actively engaged in such activities, and USCIS may consider documentation such as review requests and records of completed reviews to establish this experience.